Saithalavi Koya P A v. Joint Chief Controller Of Explosives
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE MONDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/30TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 26240 of 2015 (D) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
----------------------- SAITHALAVI KOYA P.A., PANKIAVARANANGATH, THANOOR, MALAPURAM DT, PIN-676 302.
BY ADVS.SRI.A.S.DHEERAJ SRI.P.V.JEEVESH RESPONDENT(S):
--------------------------
1. JOINT CHIEF CONTROLLER OF EXPLOSIVES NO. 26, SHASRI BHAVAN BLOCK 1-8, WING A $ D, 2ND FLOOR, HADOWS ROAD, NUNGAMBAKKOM, CHENNAI-600 034.
2. THE UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, MINISTRY OF COMMERCE AND SAFETY, NEW DELHI.
3. MUMTHAS MALIK, MUMTHAS GAS, BEACH ROAD, THANOOR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.M.R.ARUNKUMAR R2 BY ADV. SRI.B.RAMACHANDRAN, CGC R3 BY ADV. SRI.K.RAKESH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: msv/
WP(C).No. 26240 of 2015 (D) ---------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1- THE TRUE COPY OF THE FORM F LICENSE CONDITIONS. EXHIBIT P2- THE TRUE COPY OF THE FIR NO. 168/11 OF THE THANOOR POLICE STATION.
EXHIBIT P3- THE TRUE COPY OF THE MATHRUBHOOMI DAILY NEWS REPORT. EXHIBIT P4- THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 22-2-11 TO THE THANOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH SECRETARY.
EXHIBIT P5- THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION 21-8-13 TO THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THANOOR.
EXHIBIT P6- THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 4-11-13 TO THE CHIEF MINISTER.
EXHIBIT P7- THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 06-10-12 TO THE DISTRICT SUPPLY OFFICER.
EXHIBIT P8- THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 27-5-15 TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:
----------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S.TO JUDGE Msv/
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
================== W.P.(C).No. 26240 of 2015 ================== Dated this the 21st day of December, 2015
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner had approached the first respondent by Ext.P8 complaining violation of licence condition by the 3rd respondent.
This Court is of the view that the petitioner's complaint by Ext.P8 shall be considered and enquired into by the first respondent after hearing the petitioner as well as the 3rd respondent within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the copy of this judgment.
The writ petition is disposed of, as above.
sd/- sab A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE
- : 2 :-