← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/26306/2015disposed of

M.P.Muhammed v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

2015-09-01Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE TUESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/10TH BHADRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 26306 of 2015 (k) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :

--------------------- M.P. MUHAMMED AGED 51 YEARS, S/O. UNNEEN, MANNATHODI PARAPPURATH HOUSE VALIUVAMBRAM P.O., ATHANICKAL, POOKKOTTUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.K.ABDUL JAWAD SRI.ABDUL MAJEED N.

SMT.V.K.ANJU RESPONDENT :

------------------------ THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-676505.

BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. E.M. ABDUL KHADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Mn ...2/-

WP(C).No. 26306 of 2015 (k) ---------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS :

------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1:

TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGE OF THE DATA BANK. EXHIBIT P2:

TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION 13.8.15 SUBMITED BY THE PETITIONER UNDER CLAUSE 6 OF THE KLU ORDER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P3:

TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT DATED 27.7.2015 OF THE AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, POOKKOTTUR TO THE RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL -------------------------------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE Mn

A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

................................................. W.P.(C) No. 26306 of 2015 (K) ............................................... Dated this the 1st day of September, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner is stated as the owner of the property having an extent of 8.50 Ares situated in Block No.5, Re.Sy.No.179/9 of Pookkottur Village, in Ernad Taluk in Malappuram District. According to the petitioner, the land in question is a 'dry land', at least for the last 20 years. Though the land in question is actually a 'dry land', it has been described as 'paddy land' in the revenue records. The grievance of the petitioner is that, despite filing Ext.P2 application under Clause 6 of the Kerala Land Utilisation order before the Revenue Divisional Officer/respondent seeking permission for correction in the revenue records, the same is still to be considered by the respondent. Hence the challenge.

2.Heard the learned Government Pleader as well. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the petitioner will be satisfied, if a direction is given to the respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext. P2 application within a reasonable time.

W.P.(C) No. 26306 of 2015 (K) 4.In view of the pendency of the above application, there shall be a direction to the respondent to consider Ext.P2 application, after verifying the draft data bank, by giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and other parties, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/- A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE AMV/01/09/