J Sreelatha v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH FRIDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/17TH MAGHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 26577 of 2014 (V) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
---------------- J SREELATHA, W/O.SURESH BABU, CLERK, UMAYANALLOOR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED NO.3034 UMAYANALLOOR P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT RESIDING AT KADAMPATTUPANAYIL VEEDU VADAKKUMKARA KIZHAKKU, UMAYANALLOOR P.O., KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.B.MOHANLAL RESPONDENT(S):
------------------
1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT CO-OPERATIVE DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001
2. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES COLLECTORATE, CUTCHERY P.O., KOLLAM-691 013.
3. UMAYANALLOOR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED NO.3034 UMAYANALLOOR P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PPIN-691 589.
4. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF UMAYANALLOOR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED NO.3034, UMAYANALLOOR P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT-691 589.
R3&4 BY ADV. SRI.K.SUBASH CHANDRA BOSE R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.GIKKU JACOB.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 26577 of 2014 (V) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P1.THE TRUE COPY OF THE DECISION CR NO.837 DATED 17/11/1999 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
EXT.P2.THE TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.CRP (2) 2318/13 DATED 29/1/2014 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXT.P3.THE TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENTS 3 AND 4.
EXT.P4.THE TRUE COPY OF THE DECISION NO.164 DATED 20/8/2014 FORWARDED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT THE 2ND RESPONDENT RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL.
----------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE.
V.CHITAMBARESH, J.
--------------------- W.P (C) No.26577 of 2014 --------------------- Dated this the 6th day of February, 2015
J U D G M E N T
The issue pertains to the regularisation in service of the petitioner in the third respondent Bank. The third respondent Bank has already taken a decision in favour of the petitioner and forwarded the same to the second respondent. I direct the second respondent to pass orders on the question of regularisation within a period one month. The needful shall be done with notice to the petitioner and the third respondent Bank in the circumstances.
The Writ Petition is disposed of.
Sd/- V.CHITAMBARESH, Judge.
nj.