T.Ubaid v. The University Of Calicut
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH FRIDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/27TH BHADRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 26359 of 2015 (T) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
-------------------------- T. UBAID, S/O.KUNJI MOHAMMED, AGED 38 YEARS, MANAGER, CPA COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCE, PUTHENATHANI, PUNNATHALA P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-676 552. BY ADVS.SRI.K.C.SANTHOSHKUMAR, SMT.K.K.CHANDRALEKHA, SMT.K.S.SUDHA, SMT.C.LEENA.
RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------------
1. THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., THENHIPALAM, CALICUT-673 635, KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR.
2. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., THENHIPALAM, CALICUT-673 635, KERALA.
3. THE DEAN OF STUDENT'S WELFARE, DEPARTMENT OF STUDENTS WELFARE, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., THENHIPALAM, CALICUT-673 635, KERALA.
4. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
R1 TO R3 BY ADV. SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW, SC.
R4 BY SR. GOVT. PLEADER SMT.ANITHA RAVINDRAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18-09-2015, ALONG WITH WP(C).NO.26428 OF 2015 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
rs.
WP(C).No. 26359 of 2015 (T) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- EXT.P1 COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 20/08/2015 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
EXT.P2 COPY OF THE INTIMATION DATED 17/08/2015.
EXT.P3 COPY OF THE COMMON JUDGMENT DATED 24/02/2015 IN WP(C).NO.18317/2015 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT.
RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- NIL.
//TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE rs.
V. CHITAMBARESH, J -------------------------------- WP(C) NOs. 26359, 26428, 26429, 26443, 26470, 26513, 26832, 26847, 26848, 26908, 26917, 26918, 27134, 27322, 27352, 27432, 27585 OF 2015, 21164 OF 2013 & 10205 OF 2014 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 18th day of September, 2015
JUDGMENT
It is reported that the College Union Election held in the Parliamentary mode are over. The mode of conduct for the ensuing years will be dependent on the Supreme Court verdict. This is because the issue is pending before the Supreme Court at present.
The Writ Petitions are disposed of.
V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE ncd