High Court of KeralaWP(C)/29089/2013dismissed as infructuous

Sasidharan Surendran v. State Of Kerala

2015-07-20Honourable Mr. Justice Dama Seshadri Naidu3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU MONDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF JULY 2015/29TH ASHADHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 29089 of 2013 (I) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER : - ---------------------- SASIDHARAN SURENDRAN, S/O.SURENDAN, PROPRIETOR, "ROYALE REGENCY HOTEL AND CONVENTION CENTRE", OACHIRA, KOLLAM DISTRICT, RESIDING AT KUTTIAYATHU HOUSE, KOTTAMPALLY, OACHIRA, KOLLAM DISTRICT.

REPRESENTED BY P.K.SOMAN, POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, AGED 55, S/O.LATE KRISHNA PILLAI, ADMINISTRATION MANAGER, "ROYALE REGENCY HOTEL AND CONVENTION CENTRE", OACHIRA.

BY ADV. SRI.V.PHILIP MATHEWS RESPONDENTS : - --------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF EXCISE, KERALA GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR & DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, KOLLAM - 691 013.

3. THE EXCISE COMMISSIONER, COMMISSIONERATE OF EXCISE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

4. DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF, KOLLAM CITY, KOLLAM - 691 013.

5. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KOLLAM - 691 013.

6. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE, KOLLAM - 691 001.

WP(C).No. 29089 of 2013 (I) --------------------------------------

7. THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, KOLLAM - 691 013.

8. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, KARUNAGAPALLY, KOLLAM - 690 518.

9. TAHSILDAR, KARUNAGAPALLY, KOLLAM DISTRICT - 690 518.

10. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF EXCISE, KARUNAGAPALLY, KOLLAM - 691001.

11. OACHIRA GRAMA PANCHAYAT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, OACHIRA P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN CODE - 690 526.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. G. GOPAKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: DMR/-

DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.

--------------------------------------- W.P.(c) No. 29089 of 2013 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of July, 2015

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, this Court dismisses the writ petition as having become infructuous.

DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU JUDGE DMR/-