Manager v. State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:- THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/11TH BHADRA, 1937 W.P.(C).No.26439 of 2015 (D) ---------------------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):- -------------------------- MANAGER, K.S.M. L.P.SCHOOL, KUNNUMMAL, KAKKATTIL P.O., KOZHIKODE - 673 507.

BY ADVS.SRI.JIJI THOMAS SMT.SMITHA MATHEW SRI.JOHNY ANDREWS.

RESPONDENT(S):- ---------------------------- 1.

STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

2.

THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, VATAKARA, KOZHIKODE - 673 513.

3.

ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KUNNUMMAL - 673 507.

4.

SHINIJA B.K., LPSA, KUNNUMMAL SOUTH MLP. SCHOOL, KUNNUMMAL, KAKKATTIL, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN - 673 507.

R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.A.LOWSY.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:-

WP(C).No.26439 of 2015 (D) -------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:- --------------------------------------- EXT.P1:

TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 03.06.2013. EXT.P2:

TRUE COPY OF THE REJECTION ORDER DATED 31.03.2015 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

EXT.P3:

TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER IN W.A.812/2015 DATED 09/04/2015.

EXT.P4:

TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER IN W.P.(C).

NO.708/2015 DATED 09.01.2015.

EXT.P5:

TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 06.05.2015 ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:- ----------------------------------------- NIL.

Vku/- [ true copy ]

K. Vinod Chandran, J --------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.26439 of 2015-D --------------------------------------- Dated this the 02nd day of September, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner, the Manager of a school, is aggrieved with the rejection of approval of the appointment granted to the 4th respondent. The rejection order is produced at Exhibit P2.

2. Admittedly there is an appeal pending before the 2nd respondent, the memorandum of which is produced at Exhibit P5. In such circumstance, it is only proper that the appeal be disposed of expeditiously, at any rate within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment; after affording an opportunity for hearing to the petitioner. It is directed so.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/- K.Vinod Chandran Judge.

vku/- [ true copy ]