← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/29099/2013closed

Rajendran v. The City Police Chief, Kollam

2015-11-19Honourable Mr.Justice A.M.Shaffique,Honourable The Chief Justice Mr.Ashok Bhushan3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE THURSDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/28TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 29099 of 2013 (J) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S) :- ------------------ RAJENDRAN, AGED 40 YEARS, S/O.KOLAPPAN, VENI BHAVAN, BABUJI NAGAR - 86, ASRAMAM P.O., KOLLAM.

BY ADVS.SRI.PRATHEESH.P SMT.CHITHRA.S.BABU RESPONDENT(S) :- ------------------

1. THE CITY POLICE CHIEF, KOLLAM - 691 001.

2. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, EAST CIRCLE, KOLLAM - 691 001.

3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOLLAM EAST POLICE STATION, KOLLAM - 691 001.

4. AJAYAKUMAR, ALAN DAIL, NAVODAYA NAGAR - 37, ASRAMAM P.O., KOLLAM - 691 002.

R4 BY ADV. SRI.AJAYA KUMAR. G R1 - R3 BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.C.R.SYAMKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

jvt

WP(C).NO.29099 OF 2013 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS :- EXT.P1 :- THE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 7.11.2013.

EXT.P1(a) :- THE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED FROM THE OFFICE OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

EXT.P2 :- THE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 4.11.2013. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS :- NIL.

//TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE

ASHOK BHUSHAN, C.J & A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J.

------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.29099 of 2013 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 19th day of November 2015

J U D G M E N T

Shaffique, J.

This writ petition is filed seeking for police protection. It is inter alia contended that the 4th respondent was harassing the petitioner by threatening him.

2.

Learned Government Pleader submits that there had been financial transactions between the parties, which resulted in the issues. The police had enquired into the matter and asked the parties to maintain law and order. It is submitted that during the pendency of the writ petition, no untoward incident has been reported.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner would however submit that last week, there had been an incident, for which, a complaint has also been filed.

Under such circumstances, we close the writ petition observing that if there is any fresh cause of action, it is always open for the petitioner to approach the police, who shall look into the matter and do the needful.

Sd/- ASHOK BHUSHAN CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- A.M. SHAFFIQUE J UDGE Jvt/19.11.2015.