K.Sasidharan v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE FRIDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/13RD BHADRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 26713 of 2015 (L) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
----------------------- K.SASIDHARAN, AGED 58 YEARS, S/O.KUTTAN PILLAI, PROPRIETOR, METAGUARDENGINEERS & CONTRACTORS, MAVELIKKARA, RESIDING AT KALIYIKKEL PONAKAM, MAVELIKKARA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.MANOJ RAMASWAMY SMT.SANJANA R.NAIR RESPONDENT(S):
-------------------------
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.
2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT(ROADS AND BRIDGES AND ADMINISTRATIONS), PUBLIC OFFICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 004.
3. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, PWD, SOUTH CIRCLE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -695 004.
4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PWD ROADS DIVISION, KOLLAM - 691 003.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.C.K.SHERIN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: msv/
WP(C).No. 26713 of 2015 (L) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P-1: TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 4.7.2009. EXT.P-2: TRUE COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT CIRCULAR VIDE NO.NO/CE/GL/R&B/GL/1/2011-12 DATED 25.11.2011. EXT.P-3: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 5.12.2011. EXT.P-4: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 15.6.2012 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT WITH COPIES TO THE 3RD AND 4TH RESPONDENTS.
EXT.P-5: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 6.2.2015 TO THE IST RESPONDENT WITH COPY TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:
----------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S.TO JUDGE.
Msv/
A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J ---------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No. 26713 of 2015 ---------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 04th day of September, 2015
JUDGMENT
The petitioner approached the 1st respondent as per Ext.P5 alleging unauthorised deduction from the bill. In view of the limited prayer of the petitioner, the 1st respondent shall consider the same, after issuing notice to the petitioner within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/- A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE bpr