Mohammed Rafeeq v. The State Election Commission
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH FRIDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/13RD BHADRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 26721 of 2015 (M) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
---------------- MOHAMMED RAFEEQ, AGED 36 YEARS S/O.IBRAHIMKUTTY, HOUSE NO.M.P.XVII/209A MADHUR P.O., KASARGOD - 671 124.
BY ADV. SRI.SERGI JOSEPH THOMAS RESPONDENT(S):
------------------- 1.
THE STATE ELECTION COMMISSION THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REP. BY ITS SECRETARY - 695 001.
2.
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KASARGOD - 671 121 3.
THE ELECTORAL REGISTRATION OFFICER, MADHUR GRAMA PANCHAYAT KASARGOD DISTRICT - 671 121.
4.
THE MADHUR GRAMA PANCHAYAT, KASARGODE DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY - 671 121.
ADDL. 5. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATS, KASARGOD.
(ADDL. R5 IS SUO MOTU IMPLEADED AS PER JUDGMENT DATED 4.9.2015 IN THE WRIT PETITION. ) R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.K.A.SANJEETHA.
R BY SRI.MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, SC,K.S.E.COMMISSION. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
APPENDIX IN W.P.(C) No.26721 OF 2015 PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 :
TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 30.6.2015 OF THE STATE DELIMITATION COMMISSION.
EXHIBIT P2 :
TRUE COPY OF THE VOTERS LIST OF WARD NO.17 (ULIYATHADULLA) PART I OF MADHUR PANCHAYAT.
EXHIBIT P3 :
TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 20.7.2015 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE FOURTH RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P4 :
TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED NIL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P5 :
TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO.B4.4715/15 DATED 24/7/2015 OF THE FOURTH RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P6 :
TRUE COYP OF THE LETTER NO.B4.4485/15 DATED 24/7/2015 OF THE FOURTH RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENT(S) EXHIBITS NIL.
//TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE.
V.CHITAMBARESH, J.
--------------------- W.P (C) No.26721 of 2015 --------------------- Dated this the 4th day of September, 2015
J U D G M E N T
The first respondent submits that the Deputy Director of Panchayats, Kasargod has already been alerted as regards the discrepancy in the electoral roll as espoused in Exts.P3 and P4 representations. The petitioner is free to file a supplemental representation to the Deputy Director of Panchayats, Kasargod in this regard within two weeks.
2.
The Deputy Director of Panchayats, Kasargod is suo-motu impleaded as the fifth respondent in this writ petition. The fifth respondent is directed to deal with the issue and take the proceedings to a logical end. The same shall be done within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
The Writ Petition is disposed of.
Sd/- V.CHITAMBARESH, Judge.
nj.