← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/26887/2015disposed of

Dayanandan v. The Secretary

2015-09-073 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH MONDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/16TH BHADRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 26887 of 2015 (I) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER:

-------------------------- DAYANANDAN S/O. KARUNAKARAN ANASWARA, CHERATTUKUZHI DOWN HILL, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT BY ADV. SRI.SAJU J.VALLYARA RESPONDENT:

---------------------------- THE SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY MALAPPURAM, PIN - 676 505 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. K.A. SANJEETHA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 26887 of 2015 (I) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1TRUE COPY OF THE REGULAR PERMIT VIDE NO. P.ST. 10/5127/1994 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE RESPONDENT P2TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 12.08.2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:-NIL --------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE

V. CHITAMBARESH, J --------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO. 26887 OF 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 7th day of September, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner seeks clearance certificate in respect of his vehicle being operated on the basis of a valid route permit. Ext.P2 application put in by the petitioner in this regard shall be dealt with by the respondent within two weeks.

2.

Such clearance certificate can be granted without insisting on the surrender of the existing regular permit in respect of the vehicle. It shall however be ensured that all dues to the Government including check reports and also to the Kerala Motor Transport Workers Welfare Fund Board are satisfied.

3.

The respondent shall also specify the period within which the petitioner shall replace the vehicle on the route covered by the permit. This is because the vehicle now in use requires to be replaced by another to resume operations on the route covered by the permit. The Writ Petition is disposed of.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE