C.Giri v. State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS WEDNESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF JULY 2015/17TH ASHADHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 27126 of 2014 (M) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- C.GIRI, AGED 66 YEARS, S/O.CHAKRAPANI PISHARODI, "ADHARSH", MANAPPULLIKAVU KIZHAKE YAKKARA, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.T.V.JAYAKUMAR NAMBOODIRI RESPONDENT(S):

---------------------------- 1.

STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY REVENUE (DEVASWOM) DEPARTMENT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.

2.

MALABAR DEVASWOM BOARD, REPRESENTED BY COMMISSIONER, MALABAR DEVASWOM BOARD KOZHIKODE-673006.

*Addl.R3.

EXECUTIVE OFFICER SREE MANAPPULLIKKAVU BHAGAVATHI DEVASWOM, YAKKARA, PALAKKAD - 678 013.

*Addl.R4.

TRUSTEE BOARD OF SREE MANAPPULLIKKAVU BHAGAVATHI DEVASWOM REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, MANAPPULLIKAVU TEMPLE YAKKARA, PALAKKAD - 678 013.

*(ADDL.R3 AND R4 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 30.10.2014 IN IA 14836/14.) **Addl.R5.

A.MOHANDAS, AGED 64 YEARS, S/O.K.PARAMESWARAN NAIR, PLOT NO.52, DEVI NAGAR, NURANI POST, PALAKKAD - 678 004.

WP(C)27126/14 **Addl.R6.

BALU KENATH, AGED 41 YEARS, S/O.LATE RAMACHANDRAN, 25/317, KRISHNA, NEAR FIRE STATION, PALAKKAD - 678 001.

**(ADDL.R5 AND R6 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 17.12.2014 IN IA 17254/14).

***Addl.R7.

VELA COMMITTEE OF SREE MANAPULLY BHAGAVATHY DEVASWOM REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, EAST YAKKARA PALAKKAD - 678 013.

***ADDL R7 IMPLEADED SUO MOTU AS PER ORDER DATED 21.05.2015. R1 BY A.RENJITH, GOVERNMENT PLEADER R2 BY SRI.PARTHASARATHY.B, SC, MALABAR DEVASWOM BOARD ADDL.R3 BY ADV. SRI.V.V.SURENDRAN ADDL.R3 BY ADV. SRI.P.A.HARISH ADDL.R4 BY ADV. SRI.N.M.MADHU ADDL.R4 BY ADV. SMT.C.S.RAJANI ADDL.R5 & R6 BY ADV. SRI.KALEESWARAM RAJ THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & SUNIL THOMAS, JJ.

.................................................................... WP(C) No.27126 of 2014 .................................................................... Dated this the 8th day of July, 2015.

J U D G M E N T

Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, J.

Process not filed for service of notice on the additional seventh respondent. The petitioner does not appear to be interested in prosecuting the matter. He has not instructed his counsel as well. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. (THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE) (SUNIL THOMAS, JUDGE) jg