High Court of KeralaWP(C)/29587/2013dismissed as infructuous

T.Prasanna v. The Managing Director, Kerala Water Authority

2015-03-27Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque10 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE FRIDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/6TH CHAITHRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 29587 of 2013 (W) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

------------ T.PRASANNA AGED 44 YEARS W/O.C.SASI, AYODHYA, AYICKAD CHEPPAD, HARIPAD, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT ASSISTANT ENGINEER, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.S.SHANAVAS KHAN SMT.S.INDU RESPONDENT(S):

-------------------

1. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, JALA BHAVAN THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

2. THE DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER (GENERAL) KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, JALA BHAVAN THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, ALAPPUZHA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.

4. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, HARIPAD, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.

5. SABU THOMAS ASSISTANT ENGINEER, P.H.SECTION KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, EDATHUA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. R1-R4 BY ADV. SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI, SC, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY R BY SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27-03-2015, ALONG WITH WPC. 6565/2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 29587 of 2013 (W) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1- TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.KWA/JB/E4(A)3621/2000 THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DATED 27.11.13 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT. P2- TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.KWA/JB/E4(A)3621/2000 THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DATED 13.11.13 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT. P3- TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION PREFERRED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE IST RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS ---------------------------------------

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No.29587 OF 2013 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 27th day of March, 2015

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous. The submission is recorded and the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, Judge.

dpk /true copy/ P.S to Judge.