Kunjumuhammed M.P. v. Keezhmadu Grama Panchayath

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI MONDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF APRIL 2015/16TH CHAITHRA, 1937 WP(C).No.30744 of 2012 (P) --------------------------------------- PETITIONERS:

--------------------- 1.

KUNJUMUHAMMED M.P,AGED 54 YEARS, S/O.PAREED,KODAVARATH HOUSE, (MANNARATH PARAMBIL),EDAYAPPURAM, ALUVA P.O - 683 101.

2.

ALI.K.A,AGED 66 YEARS,KAREDATH HOUSE, EDAYAPURAM,ALUVA P.O.

3.

ALI M.A,AGED 50 YEARS,MOLATH HOUSE, EDAYAPURAM,ALUVA P.O.

4.

HASSAN M.B,AGED 47 YEARS,MATTATHIL HOUSE, EDAYAPURAM,ALUA P.O.

BY ADVS.SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS SMT.P.K.PRIYA SRI.K.V.SREE VINAYAKAN SRI.K.M.HASHIR SRI.K.M.MUHAMMED HUSSAIN RESPONDENTS:

------------------------ 1.

KEEZHMADU GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, KEEZHMADU,ALUVA,ERNAULAM - 683 101.

2.

KERALA STATE WAKF BOARD,REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER,ERNAKULAM - 683 101.

3.

THE EDAYAPURAM MUSLIM JAMA-ATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS MUTTAWALI, EDAYAPURAM,ALUVA - 683 101.

4.

V.K.MOHAMMED,S/O.KUNHIPAREED, MATTATHIL HOUSE,VETTIKKAKATH, EDAYAPURAM,ALUVA - 683 101.

5.

P.B.ABDU,S/O.BAPPU,PERUMBILLIL HOUSE, EDAYAPURAM,ALUVA - 683 101.

pto

....2....

WP(C).No.30744 of 2012 (P) --------------------------------------- 6.

K.M.NASAR,S/O.MARAKKAR HAJI,KODVATH HOUSE, EDAUAPURAM,ALUVA -683 101.

R1 BY ADV.SRI.S.SHANAVAS KHAN R2 BY ADV.SRI.K.SHIBILI NAHA,SC, KERALA STATE WAKF BOARD R3 TO R6 BY ADVS.SRI.BABU KARUKAPADATH SMT.M.A.VAHEEDA BABU SRI.JAGAN GEORGE SRI.K.A.NOUSHAD SRI.P.G.PRAMOD SRI.KANDAMPULLY RAHUL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06-04-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

pk

A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, J.

-------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 30744 of 2012 -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 6th day of April, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioners have come up before this Court challenging the construction by respondents 4 to 6, which, according to the petitioners, is in violation of the provisions of the Kerala Panchayath Building Rules, 2011. 2.

Today, when the matter came up for hearing, the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent panchayath as well as the learned counsel for respondents 3 to 6 submitted that the construction has been completed and the building number has also been allotted.

As the matter has become infructuous, the writ petition is dismissed.

Sd/- A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI JUDGE bka/-