S.Sushanth v. State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/26TH BHADRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 26971 of 2015 (V) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------- S.SUSHANTH AGED 35 YEARS S/O.SURENDRAN PILLAI, RESIDING AT SUSHANTH BHAVAN BHOOTHAKKULAM P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT-691302.

BY ADVS.SRI.M.RAJENDRAN NAIR SMT.M.SANTHY RESPONDENTS:

-------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO HOME DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN 695001.

2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE KOLLAM DISTRICT-691001.

3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE PARAVUR POLICE STATION, PARAVUR P.O.

KOLLAM DISTRICT-691301.

4. NALINAKSHAN PILLAI, AGED 55 YEARS S/O.NOT KNOWN CHARUVILA PUTHEN VEEDU, BHOOTHAKKULAM PARAVUR, KOLLAM DISTRICT-691301.

R1-R3 BY STATE ATTORNEY SRI. P. VIJAYARAGHAVAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 26971 of 2015 (V) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT-P1:

THE TRUE COPY OF CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRATION DT.22/05/2012. EXHIBIT-P2:

TRUE COPY OF REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE NO.PP288 DT.12/11/2014 ISSUED BY THE ASSISTANT LABOUR OFFICER.

EXHIBIT-P3:

TRUE COPY OF IDENTITY CARD OF BIJULAL.

EXHIBIT-P3(A): TRUE COPY OF IDENTITY CARD OF SUJITH. EXHIBIT-P4:

TRUE COPY OF COMPLAINT TO THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, KOLLAM, DT.17/08/2015.

EXHIBIT-P5:

TRUE COPY OF ACKNOWLEDGEMENT DT.18/08/2015 BY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE.

EXHIBIT-P5(A): TRUE COPY OF ACKNOWLEDGEMENT DT.19/08/2015 BY S.I. OF POLICE, PARAVUR.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS --------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE JJJ

ASHOK BHUSHAN, C.J.

& K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No. 26971 of 2015 (V) ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 17th day of September, 2015

J U D G M E N T

K. Vinod Chandran, J.

Since the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, as of now, there is no problem in the area, we do not think there is any reason why the writ petition should be kept pending.

2.

However, if any problem arises which creates a law and order situation, the petitioner would be entitled to move the jurisdictional police authorities, who will definitely ensure that such situation is averted. Writ petition is closed with the above observation. Sd/- ASHOK BHUSHAN, CHIEF JUSTICE.

Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE jjj/17.9