The Manager v. The State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN MONDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/27TH ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 27033 of 2015 (D) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:
-------------------- THE MANAGER CJM UP SCHOOL, MARATHAKKARA, P O MARATHAKKARA THRISSUR 680320 BY ADVS.SMT.SUMATHY DANDAPANI (SR.) SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI RESPONDENTS:
------------------------
1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, 695001
2. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN 695014
3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION THRISSUR 680003
4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER PALACE ROAD, THRISSUR 680020 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. A. LOWSY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 27033 of 2015 (D) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1:- A COPY OF THE STAFF FIXATION ORDER OF THE SCHOOL FOR THE YEAR 1999-2000 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT P2:- A COPY OF THE STAFF FIXATION ORDER ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2011-2012 P2(A):- A COPY OF THE ROLL STRENGTH OF STUDENTS FOR THE YEAR 2012-13 P2(B):- A COPY OF THE ROLL STRENGTH OF STUDENTS FOR THE YEAR 2013-14 P3:- A COPY OF THE APPLICATION DTD 18/1/2012 REQUESTING PERMISSION TO CLOSE DOWN THE SCHOOL P4:- A COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DTD 9/3/2012 IN WPC NO 5891 OF 2012 P5:- A COPY OF THE ORDER DTD 28/6/2012 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT P6:- A COPY OF THE APPLICATION DTD 1/6/2015 FILED BY THE PETITIONER REQUESTING FOR PERMISSION TO CLOSE DOWN THE SCHOOL RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS --------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE JJJ
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No. 27033 of 2015 (D) ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 19th day of October, 2015
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner's grievance is that Ext.P6 application dated 01.06.2015 has not been considered till date by the 2nd respondent.
2.
Considering the confined prayer made, there shall be a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider the application, in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing, within three months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this judgment. The Writ Petition is disposed of without any observation on merits, which shall be decided by the 2nd respondent, in accordance with law.
Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE jjj 20/10/15