High Court of KeralaWP(C)/30946/2010dismissed as infructuous

M/S.Reliance Security Agency v. Union Of India

2015-09-09Honourable Mrs. Justice Anu Sivaraman3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/18TH BHADRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 30946 of 2010 (P) -------------------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

------------------------ M/S.RELIANCE SECURITY AGENCY, REG.NO.2111.PREM BUILDING, KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM. REPRESETNED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, T.K.SAMBASIVAN.

BY ADVS.SRI.D.KISHORE SMT.MINI GOPINATH RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BYITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT, NEW DELHI-110 001.

2. THE CHIEF LABOUR COMMISSIONER, MINISTRY OF LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT, NEW DELHI-110 001.

3. BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA ENTERPRISE, TELECOM CIRCLE, ALAPPUZHA REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER-688 001.

4. THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGE(ADMN), BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED, O/O.THE GENERAL MANAGER (TELECOM) BSNL, ALAPPUZHA-688 001.

5. MAHATMA GANDHI CHARITALBLE, SOCIETY REP BY ITS SECRETARY, THIRUMALA P.O.

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 006.

6. HOUSE MASTER KOCHI SECURITY MANAGEMENT, REP.BY ITS MANAGER, VADAKKAYIL BUILDING, KARAKKAMURI, KOCHI-682 001.

7. MEEGUARD INFORCE SERVICES, REP.BY ITS MANAGER, THYCAUD P.O., OPP PRS APARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -695 014.

8. THE SPARROWS, PETTAH P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REP.BY ITS MANAGER-695 024.

9. FORCE INDIA MANAGEMENT SERVICES, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER, PULIMOODU P.O.

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -695 001.

10. ADAMS SECUTIRY AGENCY.

REP BY ITS MANAGER, PUTHUKUDY P.O., NEGARCOIL, TAMIL NADU-628 621.

R3 & R4 BY ADV. SRI.SAJI VARGHESE R1&R2 BY ADV.SRI.N.NAGARESH, ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA.

R3 & R4 BY SRI.MATHEWS K.PHILIP,SC, BSNL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: DG

ANU SIVARAMAN, J.

------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.30946 of 2010 -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 9th day of September, 2015

J U D G M E N T

It is submitted by the counsel for the petitioner that the writ petition has become infructuous. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN, JUDGE) //TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE DG