Vilasini v. Udaya Kumar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/18TH BHADRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 27135 of 2015 (N) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

---------------------- VILASINI VASUDEVAN, AGED 50 YEARS, W/O LATE VASUDEVAN A.R., ARYATTU HOUSE, PERUMPETTY P.O., PERUMPETTY VILLAE, PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN:689 592.

BY ADV. SMT.MIJI JOHN RESPONDENT(S):

-------------------------

1. UDAYA KUMAR K.C., AGED 34 YEARS, S/O CHELLAPPAN PILLAI, VAARYATHU PUTHEN VEETIL, PORUVAZHI P.O., CINEMA PARAMBU, ADOOR, KOLLAM, PIN:690 520.

2. S.I. OF POLICE, PERUMPETTY POLICE STATION, PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN:689 592.

3. C.I. OF POLICE, PERUMPETTY, PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN:689 592.

4. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN:689 845.

5. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN:695 001.

R2 TO R5 BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.C.R.SYAMKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: msv/

WP(C).No. 27135 of 2015 (N) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1: TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 9.10.2013 WITH ENGLISH TRANSLATION.

EXHIBIT P2: TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 26.5.2015 BEFORE THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, WOMENS CELL PATHANAMTHITTA WITH ENGLISH TRANSLATION.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

----------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S.TO JUDGE Msv/

ASHOK BHUSHAN, C.J.

& A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J.

================ W.P. (C) No. 27135 of 2015 ================== Dated this, the 9th day of September, 2015

J U D G M E N T

Ashok Bhushan, C.J.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader. No notice is being issued to the 1st respondent in view of the judgment which is being passed. 2.

In this writ petition, petitioner has prayed for a direction to respondents 2 to 5 to grant adequate police protection to the petitioner. Petitioner's case is that petitioner has two daughters and 1st respondent is the son in law of the petitioner. Allegation has been made against the 1st respondent that he has entered into the house and is asking for partition of the property.

3.

Learned Government Pleader after obtaining instructions submitted that after receipt of the complaint, 1st respondent was called at the Police Station by the 3rd respondent and has been warned. It is submitted that there has been no

W.P(C) No.27135/15 -:2:- complaint thereafter. In the above view of the matter, we see no reason to issue any direction. We, however, observe that as and when any attempt or offence is committed, it shall be open for the petitioner to file a complaint, which shall be looked into. Writ petition is closed.

Sd/- ASHOK BHUSHAN, CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- A.M. SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE Rp //True Copy// PS to Judge