High Court of KeralaWP(C)/27358/2014disposed of

V.Sivasankaran Nair v. The Joint Registrar(G)Co-Operative Societies

2015-07-27Honourable Mr. Justice Dama Seshadri Naidu5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU MONDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF JULY 2015/5TH SRAVANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 27358 of 2014 (T) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

-------------- V.SIVASANKARAN NAIR, USHUS, MAVINMOODU, KALLAMBALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

BY ADVS.SRI.B.S.SWATHY KUMAR SRI.REMYA MURALI SRI.A.K.RAJESH SRI.VENKATESH GOPI RESPONDENTS:- -------------------

1. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES GENERAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 001.

2. THE OTTOOR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.976, CHENNANCODU, VADASSERIKONAM P.O., VARKALA, PIN - 695 543, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

3. THE MANAGING COMMITTEE OF THE OTTOOR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.976, CHENNANCODU, VADASSERIKONAM P.O., VARKALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 543 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT.

ADDL. R4 IMPLEADED:

4. THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

(ADDL.R4 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 27.07.2015 IN I.A. NO. 10578/2015) R3 BY ADV. SRI.P.N.MOHANAN R BY SRI. G. GOPAKUMAR, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 27358 of 2014 (T) ---------------------------- : 2 :

APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS :

----------------------------- EXHIBIT P1. TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN W.P.(C)NO.13371/2014 DATED 27.05.2014.

EXHIBIT P2. TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONERS AND OTHERS BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 17.06.2014. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL -------------------------------- /True Copy/ P.A to Judge.

DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.

---------------------------------- W.P. (C) No. 27358 of 2014 ---------------------------------- Dated this the 27th day of July, 2015.

JUDGMENT

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Pleader and the learned counsel for the respondent Bank, apart from perusing the record.

2. The petitioner, who is the member of the second respondent Bank, has a grievance against the third respondent. Complaining of the administrative shortcomings and the alleged mismanagement by the third respondent, the petitioner has submitted Ext.P2 representation before the additional 4th respondent. Seeking expeditious consideration of Ext.P2 representation by the additional 4th respondent, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition. In the facts and circumstances, having regard to the respective submissions of the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent Bank, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of

W.P.(C.) No.27358/2014 -2the matter, disposes of the writ petition with a direction to the additional 4th respondent to consider the petitioner's Ext.P2 representation in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders thereon, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. sd/- DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, JUDGE.

W.P.(C.) No.27358/2014 -3-