Shivadas Y. v. The Secretary, Kerala Public Service Commission

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/18TH BHADRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 27238 of 2015 (D) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

-------------------- SHIVADAS Y. AGED 32 YEARS, S/O. RAGHAVAN ACHARY, YEROL KIZHAKKEKARA, MYLATTY P.O., 671 319, KASARAGOD DISTRICT BY ADVS.SRI.KRISHNADAS P. NAIR SMT.K.L.SREEKALA SRI.HARIDAS P.NAIR SRI.M.A.VINOD SRI.M.RAJESH KUMAR SRI.K.R.RAMESH SMT.B.SABITHA (DESOM) SMT.K.JYOTHY RESPONDENTS:

------------------------ 1.

THE SECRETARY, KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, THULASI HILLS PATTOM PALANCE P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 004. 2.

THE DISTRICT OFFICER, KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, KASARGOD DISTRICT 671 121 3.

THE DEPARTMENT OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION, STATE OF KERALA, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001.

4.

THE DISTRICT OFFICER, TECHNICAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT KASARAGOD 671 121 R2 TO R4 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. M.J. RAJASREE R1 BY SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN, SC, KPSC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 27238 of 2015 (D) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1 :

TRUE COPY OF THE RANK LIST DATED 02.11.2010 P2 :

COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 19.06.2015 P3 :

TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO.10455/S.C3/15/DATED 12.06.2015 RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE JJJ

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No. 27238 of 2015 (D) ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 9th day of September, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is aggrieved with the non-reporting of vacancies by the 3rd respondent for filling up from the ranked list at Ext.P1.

2.

The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Kerala Public Service Commission would submit that the ranked list had expired on 1.5.2015 on completion of 41⁄2 year period and in such circumstance, Ext.P3 would not be applicable to Ext.P1 ranked list.

3.

In such circumstance, the writ petition is devoid of merit and the same is dismissed in limine. Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE jjj