← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/27246/2015disposed of

Rose Mary v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

2015-09-09Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/18TH BHADRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 27246 of 2015 (E) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

----------------------- ROSE MARY, AGED 31 YEARS, W/O. KOCHUPAUL, KAVALAKKATTU HOUSE, VADAMA P.O., MALA, THRISSUR - 680 736.

BY ADVS.SRI.BINOY VASUDEVAN SMT.P.G.BABITHA RESPONDENT(S):

-------------------------

1. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, THRISSUR- 680001.

2. THE TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, IRINJALAKUDA-680731.

3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, VILLAGE OFFICE, IRINJALAKUDA-680731.

BY SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.K.SOYUZ THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

PJ

WP(C).No. 27246 of 2015 (E) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT-P1TRUE COPY OF THE DOCUMENT NO. 1953/2014 OF SRO, IRINJALAKUDA.

EXHIBIT-P2TRUE COPY OF THE LAND TAX RECEIPT DATED 19/09/2014 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT-P3TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 24/05/2015. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS --------------------------------------- NIL.

/ TRUE COPY / P.S. TO JUDGE PJ

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.27246 of 2015 ---------------------------------- Dated this the 9th day of September, 2015.

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner has approached the 1st respondent under Clause 6 of Kerala Land Utilisation Order by filing Ext.P3 representation.

2. The petitioner's case is that the above land is a converted land much before the enactment of Act 28/2008.

3. In view of the claim of the petitioner, the case shall be considered under Clause 6 of the Keala Land Utilisation Order by the 1st respondent, after verifying the draft Data Bank to find out whether the property of the petitioner is a paddy or wet land under Act 28/2008. If the property is not classified as above, necessarily Ext.P3 representation submitted by the petitioner shall be considered under Clause 6 of KLU Order for utilising other purpose. Needful shall be done within a period of 2 months of receipt of copy of this judgment, after giving notice to the petitioner.

Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, Judge.

ami/ //True copy// P.A.to Judge