High Court of KeralaWP(C)/31098/2012disposed of

Ameer v. State Of Kerala

2015-01-083 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/18TH POUSHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 31098 of 2012 (J) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S) :- --------------------

1. AMEER, S/O.UNNEN KUTTY HAJI, ERANHIKKAL HOUSE, KONDOTTY AMSOM, KOLATHUR DESOM, P.O.THURAKKAL, PIN - 673638, MALAPPURAM.

2. SIDHIQUE, S/O.KOMUKUTTY, KARIKUZHIYAN HOUSE, KONDOTTY AMSOM, KOLATHUR DESOM, P.O.THURAKKAL, PIN - 673638, MALAPPURAM.

3. SAHEEDALI, S/O.ISMAYIL MASTER, KARIMBULAKKAL HOUSE, KONDOTTY AMSOM, KOLATHUR DESOM, P.O.THURAKKAL, PIN - 673638, MALAPPURAM.

BY ADV. SRI.M.K.CHANDRA MOHANDAS RESPONDENT(S) :- ------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MALAPPURAM - 676505.

3. THE TAHSILDAR, ERNAD TALUK, MANJERI - 676121.

4. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, VILLAGE OFFICE, NILAMBUR VILLAGE PIN - 676 121.

BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.MOHAMMED SHAFI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

jvt

WP(C).No.31098 OF 2012 APPENDIX Petitioner's Exhibits :- Ext.P1 :- PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE PROPERTY.

Ext.P2 :- A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD.30.10.2012 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

Respondent's Exhibits :- NIL.

//True Copy// P.A. to Judge

THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.

----------------------------------------------------- W.P (C) No.31098 of 2012 ------------------------------------- Dated this the 8th day of January, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioners are before this Court primarily because Ext.P2 request is not yet considered by the competent authority. Without expressing anything on merits, it is therefore directed that the 3rd respondent shall conduct necessary local inspection and other procedures and decide on Ext.P2 request having regard to the principles of law contained in the decisions of the High Court as would apply. That shall be done after giving the petitioners an opportunity of personal hearing through a duly representative or advocate of their choice. Final decision shall be taken within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

This writ petition is ordered accordingly.

Sd/- THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN JUDGE Jvt