← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/27350/2015disposed of

Radhamany v. The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Kollam

2015-09-16Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/25TH BHADRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 27350 of 2015 (P) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER:

-------------------------- RADHAMANY AGED 58 YEARS UMA BHAVAN, EDAMULAKKAL P.O., ANCHAL KOLLAM.

BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS:

----------------------------

1. THE SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY CUM REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER (RTO) KOLLAM-691001.

2. THE REGIONAL TARNSPORT AUTHORITY ALAPPUZHA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY-691001. BY ADV.K.A.SANJEETHA, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 27350 of 2015 (P) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1- TRUE COPY OF THE REPLACEMENT APPLICATION DATED 7-9-2015 ALONG WITH THE CHELAN RECEIPT WITH STAGE CARRIAGE KL 38/1704 TO THE OUTGOING VEHICLE NUMBER KL 25/A 1098 IN RESPECT OF THE ROUTE ANCHAL-KOLLAM.

EXHIBIT P2- TRUE COPY OF THE CHELAN RECEIPT DATED 7-9-2015. EXHIBIT P3- TRUE COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1S RESPONDENT DATED 7-9-2015. EXHIBIT P4- TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 20-2-2014 IN WPC NO. 5085/2014.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS --------------------------------------- NIL TRUE COPY SKS P.A. TO JUDGE

V.CHITAMBARESH, J.

-------------------------------------- W.P(C)NO. 27350 OF 2015 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 16th day of September, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner confines her relief to an early consideration of Ext.P1 application to replace the vehicle to continue the operations on the route.

2.

I direct the first respondent to consider Ext.P1 application with notice to the petitioner. The needful shall be done within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. V.CHITAMBARESH, JUDGE sks