K.K.Chandran v. Union Of India And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI TUESDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/7TH MAGHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 30400 of 2011 (Y) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S) :

------------------------- K.K.CHANDRAN, (NO.773040045 COOK), C.I.S.F.UNIT N.T.P.C, KAYAMKULAM, ALAPPUZHA NOW RESIDING AT A-18, C.I.S.F.UNIT N.T.P.C., KAYAMKULAM.

BY ADVS.SRI.R.SUNIL KUMAR SMT.A.SALINI LAL RESPONDENT(S) :

----------------------------

1. UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, NORTH BLOCK, C ENTRAL SECRETARIATE, NEW DELHI-110 001, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY.

2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL, CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL SECURITY FORCE, 13, CGO COMPLEX, LODHI ROAD, NEW DELHI-110 003.

3. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL, CISF (SZ) HEAD QUARTERZ, CHENNAI, PIN-600 004.

4. THE UNIT COMMANDER, CISF UNIT, NATIONAL THERMAL POWER CORPORATION, KAYAMKULAM, PIN-690 502.

BY ADV. SRI.N.NAGARESH, ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Msd.

WP(C).No. 30400 of 2011 (Y) ----------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1:

COPY OF ORDER NO.H-27011/26/2009-PEII DATED 29TH OCTOBER 2009.

EXHIBIT P2:

COPY OF ORDER DATED 25TH SEPTEMBER 2010.

EXHIBIT P3:

COPY OF ORDER DATED 17.02.2011.

EXHIBIT P4:

COPY OF THE M.A.C.P (SCHEME).

EXHIBIT P5:

COPY OF THE PAY SLIP OF THE PETITIONER.

EXHIBIT P6:

COPY OF THE SALARY PAY SLIP OF SHYAM LAL.

EXHIBIT P7:

COPY OF THE COMPLAINT BEFORE THE DIRECTOR GENERAL IN DATED 22.01.2011.

EXHIBIT P8:

COPY OF ORDER OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 07.06.2011. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS ----------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A.TO JUDGE.

Msd.

A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, J.

-------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 30400 of 2011 -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 27th day of January, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The matter relates to grant of Modified Assured Carrier Progression (MACP) benefits to the petitioner. 2.

Today, when the matter came up for hearing, the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents, inviting my attention to the statement filed by them, submitted that orders have been issued extending the benefit of MACP (Ext.P8) to the petitioner and it will take some more time to disburse the amount.

Recording the said submission, the writ petition is closed directing the respondents to disburse the amount as early as possible.

Sd/- A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, JUDGE bka/-