High Court of KeralaWP(C)/27438/2015disposed of

R.Srinivasan v. Tahsildar, Kanayannur

2015-09-11Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE FRIDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/20TH BHADRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 27438 of 2015 (D) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------- R.SRINIVASAN, AGED 45 YEARS, S/O.RAMAKRISHNA SHARMA, GOKULAM HOUSE, THEKKANARYADU MURIYIL, DISTRICT COURT VARD, MULLACKAL VILLAGE, ALAPPUZHA HEAD P.O. - PIN - 688 001.

BY ADV. SRI.M.NARENDRA KUMAR RESPONDENT(S):

--------------------------

1. TAHSILDAR, KANAYANNUR TALUK OFFICE, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682 313.

2. VILLAGE OFFICER, THEKKUMBHAGOM VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682 313.

3. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM, PIN - 695 001.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BIJU MEENATTOOR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

mbr/

WP(C).No. 27438 of 2015 (D) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS:

EXT. P1 :

TRUE COPY OF THE RELEASE DEED NUMBER 574/14 OF SRO, TRIPUNITHURA DATED 18.2.2014.

EXT. P2 :

TRUE COPY OF THE RELEASE DEED NUMBER AND 3609/14 OF SRO, TRIPUNITHURA DATED 3.12.2014.

EXT. P3 :

TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 20.7.2015 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:

NIL.

//TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE mbr/

A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

................................................. W.P.(C) No.27438 of 2015 (D) ............................................... Dated this the 11th day of September, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner is the absolute owner in possession of 6.24 cents of land covered by Exts.P1 & P2 release deeds. The petitioner sought for mutation and approached the authority to effect transfer of registry, the same was not considered. Therefore, the petitioner filed Ext.P3 application before the 3rd respondent. Even after Ext.P3, the respondents have not taken any steps to effect mutation in the name of the petitioner, hence this writ petition.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for the respondents.

3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of, with a direction to the Tahsildar/1st respondent to consider Ext.P3 representation, after issuing notice to the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, within a period one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/- A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE AMV/11/09/