High Court of KeralaWP(C)/31126/2008dismissed for default

Vinesh S. v. State Of Kerala And Others

2015-06-04Honourable Mr. Justice Anil K.Narendran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN THURSDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/14TH JYAISHTA, 1937 WP(C).No. 31126 of 2008 (E) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- VINESH S, (INSTRUCTOR GR. II (ON LEAVE), CHEMICAL ENGG. DEPT, T.K.M. COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING KOLLAM, KERALA, PRESENTLY AT AL HAI & AL MUKADDAM FOR GEO TECHNICAL WORKS (LLC) POST BOX NO. 78943 RASHIDIYA, DUBAI, U.A.E.

BY ADV. SRI.V.K.SUNIL RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

2. THE PRINCIPAL, T.K.M. COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, KOLLAM.

3. THE GOVERNING COUNCIL REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, T.K.M. COLLEGE, OF ENGINEERING KOLLAM.

4. THE CHAIRMAN, GOVERNING COUNCIL, T.K.M. COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, KOLLAM.

R2 - R4 BY ADV. SRI.N.SUGATHAN R1 BY ADV.P.V.ELIAS, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JV

ANIL K. NARENDRAN, J.

------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.31126 of 2008 ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 4th day of June, 2015

JUDGMENT

This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner who was an Instructor (Grade II) in T.K.M. College of Engineering, Kollam, seeking a declaration that Ext.P6 Government Order is ultra vires and also for a writ of certiorari to quash Exts.P2 and P5 orders and to direct the 1st respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P1 application as provided under Statute 25 of the Kerala University (Conditions of Service of Teachers and Members of Non-teaching Staff) First Statutes, 1979 and Rule 64 of Part I of the Kerala Service Rules, within a time fixed by this Court.

2. On 22.05.2015, when this writ petition came up for final hearing, there was no representation for the petitioner. Today also, there is no representation for the petitioner.

3. The learned Standing Counsel for respondents 2 to 4, on instructions, submitted that in the year 2008 itself, the petitioner was terminated from service and he is no more in service of the

W.P.(C) No.31126/2008 College.

In these circumstances, this writ petition is dismissed for default.

SD/- ANIL K. NARENDRAN, JV JUDGE