High Court of KeralaWP(C)/30218/2013dismissed as infructuous

Ramankutty v. The Kerala State Election Commission

2015-12-21Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH MONDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/30TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 30218 of 2013 (B) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- RAMANKUTTY S/O.THANKAPPAN, MANALKALAYIL, P.O CHAKKUPALLAM IDUKKI PIN 685 509 BY ADVS.SRI.M.R.VENUGOPAL SMT.DHANYA P.ASHOKAN RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. THE KERALA STATE ELECTION COMMISSION THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY PIN 695 001

2. ANTONY SKARIA, KUZHIKKATTU HOUSE, P.O CHAKKUPALLAM IDUKKI DISTRICT PIN 685 509 R1 BY ADV. SRI.MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, SC,K.S.E.COMM R-R2 BY ADV. SRI.K.JAJU BABU (SR.) R-R2 BY ADV. SMT.M.U.VIJAYALAKSHMI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 2112-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 30218 of 2013 (B) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF O.P NO 26/2012 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE KERALA STATE ELECTION COMMISSION EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE WRITTEN STATEMENT FILED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 19-06-2012 EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO S2-44241/2011 DATED 25-01-2012 OF THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,IDUKKI EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO S2-44241/2011 DATED 04-04-2012 OF THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,IDUKKI EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO 10649/E.S.06/12/CRD DATED 06-112012 OF THE RURAL DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF THE AUDIT REPORT NO L.F 1.9/1504/2012 DATED 0703-2013 CONDUCTED BY THE DISTRICT FUND AUDIT DEPARTMENT RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS ---------------------------------------

V.CHITAMBARESH, J.

--------------------- W.P (C) No.30218 of 2013 --------------------- Dated this the 21st day of December, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The disqualification proposed is co-terminous with the term. The term has expired and the writ petition has become infructuous. Hence the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. V.CHITAMBARESH, Judge.

sks