Mariyamma Uthuppu v. State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/13TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 30233 of 2013 (D) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :

------------------ MARIYAMMA UTHUPPU, AGED 60 YEARS, W/O. LATE UTHUPPU, MALAKKARAN HOUSE, MARKET ROAD, CHALAKUDY.

BY ADVS.SRI.SHEEJO CHACKO SRI.SANGEETH C. SUBRAMANIAN SRI.P.JINISH PAUL RESPONDENTS :

----------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695001.

2. DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (RURAL), THRISSUR-680003.

3. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHALAKKUDY, PIN-680307.

4. S.I. OF POLICE, CHALAKKUDY, PIN-680307.

5. SAJU UTHUPPU,S/O.UTHUPPU, MALAKKARAN HOUSE, CHALAKUDY PIN-680307.

6. BIJU, S/O.UTHUPPU, MALAKKARAN HOUSE, CHALAKUDY PIN-680307.

R1 BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. C.R. SYAMKUMAR R5 & R6 BY ADV. SRI.M.H.HANIL KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

bp

WP(C).No. 30233 of 2013 (D) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P1:

TRUE COPY OF THE OBITUARY COLUMN APPEARED IN MALAYALA MANORAMA DAILY DATED 22.3.2013.

EXT.P2:

TRUE COPY OF RELEVANT PAGES OF THE RATION CARD SHOWING THE DETAILS OF THE FAMILY MEMBERS.

EXT.P3:

TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 25.11.2013 FILED BEFORE THE S.I.OF POLICE,CHALAKUDY.

EXT.P4:

TRUE COPY OF COURIER RECEIPTS DATED 25.11.2013. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :

NIL.

//TRUE COPY// P.S.TO JUDGE bp

ASHOK BHUSHAN, C.J.

& A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J.

================ W.P. (C) No. 30233 of 2013 ================== Dated this, the 4th day of November, 2015

J U D G M E N T

Shaffique, J.

Petitioner has approached this Court seeking for police protection. It is alleged that respondents 5 and 6, children of her husband's first marriage, are threatening the petitioner and calling upon her to execute release deed in their favour. 2.

Learned counsel appearing for respondents 5 and 6 submits that they have no intention to cause any threat or obstruction to the petitioner in any manner.

Learned Government Pleader submits that after the filing of the writ petition, no untoward incident had been reported so far. Under such circumstances, we close this writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to approach the police, if there is any further cause of action.

Sd/- ASHOK BHUSHAN, CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- A.M. SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE Rp 4/11/2015