High Court of KeralaWP(C)/27589/2015disposed of

Vijayalakshmi v. The Secretary

2015-09-16Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/25TH BHADRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 27589 of 2015 (W) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

--------------- VIJAYALAKSHMI AGED 46 YEARS W/O.RAJAN, PALAYATT HOUSE, VILLYAPPALLY P.O.

VADAKARA, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.SAJU J.VALLYARA SRI.L.MURALEEDHARAN RESPONDENT(S):

------------------ THE SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, VADAKARA-673010. BY ADV.K.A SANJEETHA,GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 27589 of 2015 (W) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT-P1: PHOTOCOPY OF THE REGUAL PERMIT VIDE PERMIT NO.P.ST.18/310/2003 DATED 26.07.2013 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT-P2: PHOTOCOPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 07.09.2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS --------------------------------------- NIL TRUE COPY SKS P.A TO JUDGE

V.CHITAMBARESH, J.

--------------------- W.P (C) No.27589 of 2015 --------------------- Dated this the 16th day of September, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner seeks clearance certificate in respect of his vehicle being operated on the basis of a valid route permit. Ext.P2 application put in by the petitioner in this regard shall be dealt with by the respondent within two weeks.

2. Such clearance certificate can be granted without insisting on the surrender of the existing regular permit in respect of the vehicle. It shall however be ensured that all dues to the Government including check reports and also to the Kerala Motor Transport Workers Welfare Fund Board are satisfied.

3. The respondent shall also specify the period within which the petitioner shall replace the vehicle on the route covered by the permit. This is because the vehicle now in use requires to be replaced by another to resume operations on the route covered by the permit.

The Writ Petition is disposed of.

V.CHITAMBARESH, Judge.

sks