High Court of KeralaWP(C)/27674/2015disposed of

Mathew Philip v. The Tahsildar

2015-09-14Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE MONDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/23RD BHADRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 27674 of 2015 (H) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :

----------------------- MATHEW PHILIP, S/O.LATE P.PHILIP, AGED 65 YEARS,HOUSE NO.37/1710B, PULIMOOTTIL HOUSE, KUMARAN ASAN NAGAR, KADAVANTHARA, ERNAKULAM -682 020.

BY ADVS.SRI.JOHNSON MANAYANI SRI.BENHUR JOSEPH MANAYANI SRI.JEEVAN MATHEW MANAYANI RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. THE TAHSILDAR, KANAYANNOOR TALUK, TALUK OFFICE, KOCHI -682 011.

2. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, KAKKANADU VILLAGE, KAKKANADU P.O, ERNAKULAM -682 030.

3. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS TAHSILDAR, KANAYANNOOR TALUK, TALUK OFFICE, ERNAKULAM - 682 011.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BIJU MEENATTOOR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

sts

WP(C).No. 27674 of 2015 (H) ------------------------------------------ APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1 - THE TRUE COPY OF THE EXTRACT OF THE RESOLUTION PASSED BY THE BOARD ON 1.4.2015 P2 - THE TRUE COPY OF THE PATTAYAM ISSUED WITH REGARD TO 13.313 CENTS OF BLOCK NO.9, R.S. NO.723/2 IS KAKKANAD VILLAGE P3 - THE TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO SRI.ABDUL KAREEM, DATED 17.8.2010 P4 - THE TRUE COPY OF THE SKETCH OF THE PROPERTIES IN QUESTION. P5 - THE TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT DATED 6.7.2015 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

NIL ----------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE sts

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

***************************************************************************** W.P.(C) No.27674 of 2015 ****************************************************************************** Dated this the 14th day of September, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner approached the first respondent by Ext.P5. 2.

The petitioner points out that there are certain discrepancies in actual extent of the land and therefore, he may be permitted to pay the land tax for an extent of 19.25 cents. This court is of the view that Ext.P5 application shall be considered by the first respondent after issuing notice to the petitioner within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE ln