High Court of KeralaWP(C)/28131/2014dismissed

Koshy M.Koshy v. State Of Kerala

2015-03-17Honourable Mr.Justice P.R.Ramachandra Menon2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON TUESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/26TH PHALGUNA, 1936 WP(C).No. 28131 of 2014 (N) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

----------------------- KOSHY M. KOSHY, AGED 50 YEARS, S/O. KOSHY, MANKOYIKAL HOUSE, VETTIYAR, MAVELIKKARA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.R.SUNIL KUMAR SMT.A.SALINI LAL RESPONDENT(S):

-------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM - 695 001.

2. THE PRESIDENT, DISTRICT PANCHAYATH, DISTRICT PANCHAYATH OFFICE, COLLECTORATE COMPLEX, ALAPPUZHA - 688 001.

3. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, VEGETABLE AND FRUITS PROMOTION COUNCIL, KERALA, KAKKANAD, KOCHI - 682 030.

BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.JOSEPH GEORGE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: msv/

P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.

======================== W.P.(C). No. 28131 of 2014 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 17th day of March, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayers:

"i. Issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writs, orders or directions, to call for the records pertaining Exhibit P1 and quash the same.

ii. To direct the 1st respondent to treat Exhibit P1 agreement as illegal in eye of law.

iii. To grant such other reliefs as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case."

2. When the matter came up for consideration before this Court on 27.01.2015, it was observed that the petitioner had not impleaded the affected parties in the party array whose names have been mentioned in Ext.P1. The petitioner was given further opportunity in this regard on 5.2.2015 and 9.3.2015 as well. Today also the position remains the same and there is no representation for the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner has lost interest in the cause of action.

The writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE.

kp/-