High Court of KeralaWP(C)/28053/2015disposed of

Radhamaniamma v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

2015-09-16Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/25TH BHADRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 28053 of 2015 (F) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------- RADHAMANIAMMA, KANNAMPALLIL VEEDU, KADAPRA-MANNAR P.O., THIRUVALLA TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.PRAMOD J.DEV RESPONDENT(S):

-------------- 1.

THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, CHENGANNUR, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT 689 121.

KRISHNAPILLAI, NOORAATT HOUSE (DEVI PRIYA), KURATTIKKAD, MANNAR P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT 689 621.

R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.C.K.SHERIN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 28053 of 2015 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

EXHIBIT P1: COPY OF SALE DEED NO.1233/2013 OF SUB REGISTRAR'S OFFICE, MANNAR.

EXHIBIT P2: COPY OF COMPLAINT DATED 1.9.2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT.

/TRUE COPY/ PS TO JUDGE vgs

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.28053 of 2015 ---------------------------------- Dated this the 16th day of September, 2015.

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner approached the 1st respondent by Ext.P2, alleging that the 2nd respondent has encroached upon a Government land. This Court is of the view that, Ext.P2 shall be considered by the 1st respondent, after giving notice to the petitioner and the 2nd respondent and if it is found that the 2nd respondent has encroached upon the Government land, necessary action shall be taken to remove the encroachment alleged by the petitioner in accordance with the provisions contemplated under the Kerala Land Conservancy Act. Needful shall be done within a period of 2 months of receipt of copy of this judgment.

Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, Judge.

ami/ //True copy// P.A.to Judge