The Manager, K.R.P.M. Higher Secondary School v. The State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/25TH BHADRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 28070 of 2015 () --------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- 1.

THE MANAGER, K.R.P.M. HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL SEETHATHODU, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT 2.

R.SREE VIDYA UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT K.R.P.M HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL SEETHATHODU, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT BY ADVS.SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.M.SAJJAD RESPONDENT(S):

---------------------------- 1.

THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001 2.

THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 014 3.

THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION PATHANAMTHITTA AT THIRUVALLA - 689 101 3.

THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT 689 001 4.

THE HEADMASTER K.R.P.M HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL SEETHATHODU, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT 689 667 R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. P.M JOSEPH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 28070 of 2015 () APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS:

EXT.P1 COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER OF THE 2ND PETITIONER DATED 5.01.09 EXT.P2 COPY OF THE G.O(RT) NO.4046/2012/G.EDN. DATED 23.8.12 OF THE GOVERNMENT.

EXT.P3 COPY OF THE G.O(RT) NO.4257/2014/G.EDN. DATED 17.10.14 OF THE GOVERNMENT.

EXT.P4 COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER DATED 6.7.12.

EXT.P5 COPY OF THE REVIEW PETIITON FILED BEFORE THE HON'BLE MINISTER DATED 11.11.14.

EXT.P6 COPY OF THE REVIEW PETIITON FILED BEFORE THE HON'BLE MINISTER BY THE 2ND PETITIONER.

EXT.P7 COPY OF THE ORDER NO.B4-14518/14/K.DIS DATED 6.2.15 OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS:

NIL // TRUE COPY // P.A TO JUDGE.

SB

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

===================== W.P.(C) No.28070 of 2015 - G ====================== Dated this the 16th day of September, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioners are purportedly aggrieved with the non-consideration of Exts.P5 and P6 review petition filed before the Education Minister. The petitioners only pray for consideration of the said petitions. However, the petitions are filed before the Education Minister and not before any of the respondents. In such circumstance, no direction can be issued. Further, it is to be noticed that the Educational authority has already rejected the prayer by Ext.P7. In such circumstance, nothing survives in the writ petition. The writ petition would stand dismissed.

Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE SB // true copy // P.A to Judge.