High Court of KeralaWP(C)/28086/2015disposed of

C.Fathima v. The State Of Kerala

2015-09-16Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/25TH BHADRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 28086 of 2015 (I) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- C.FATHIMA, AGED 29 YEARS WIFE OF SHAMEER HIGH SCHOOL ASSISTANT (NATURAL SCIENCE) CHACKKALAKKAL HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, MADAVOOR KOZHIKODE DISTRICT - 673 585 BY ADVS.SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.M.SAJJAD RESPONDENT(S):

---------------------------- 1.

THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001 2.

THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER THAMARASSERY, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT - 673 573 3.

THE MANAGER CHAKKALAKKAL HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, MADAVOOR KOZHIKODE DISTRICT - 673 585 R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. P.M JOSEPH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 28086 of 2015 (I) APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS :

EXT. P1:

TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER OF THE PETITIONER DATED 3.6.2013.

EXT. P2:

TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO A5/7806/2013/K.DIS. DATED 09.10.2014 OF THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION.

EXT. P3:

TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO. A5/7480/14/K.DIS. DATED 20.02.2015 OF THE DISTRICT EDL. OFFICER.

EXT. P4:

TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION FILED BEFORE THE GOVERNMENT DATED 27.03.2015.

EXT. P5:

TRUE COPY OF THE G.O. (RT.) NO. 3200/2015/G.EDN. DATED 3.8.2015 OF THE GOVERNMENT.

EXT. P6:

TRUE COPY OF THE REVIEW PETITION SUBMITTED BEFORE THE GOVERNMENT DATED 01.09.2015, WITHOUT ANNEXURE. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL.

/TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE SB

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

===================== W.P.(C) No.28086 of 2015 - I ====================== Dated this the 16th day of September, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is aggrieved with the nonconsideration of Ext.P6 review petition filed before the 1st respondent. The review petition is filed on 01.09.2015.

2. In such circumstance, the 1st respondent definitely will have to look at the revisions pending before it and dispose of the same in accordance with law, however looking at the pendency of such revisions before it, taking up for disposal those applications filed earlier in point of time first. The revisions shall be disposed of as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within six months.

Writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE SB // true copy // P.A to Judge.