M. Radha v. State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/1ST ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 28111 of 2015 (L) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------- M. RADHA, AGED 61 YEARS RETIRED OVERSEER FIRST GRADE, WIFE OF SURENDRAN, 'DEVI VILASOM', TC 11/1765, KOWDIAR P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

BY ADV. SRI.SOJAN MICHEAL RESPONDENTS:

---------------------------- 1.

STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, URBAN AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

2.

THE DIRECTOR, URBAN AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

3.

THE CORPORATION OF THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

4.

THE CHIEF ENGINEER, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 001.

R1 TO R2 & R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. A. LOWSY R3 BY SRI.P.K.MANOJKUMAR,SC,TVPM CORPORATION THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 28111 of 2015 (L) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1 :

TRUE COPY OF THE RETIREMENT ORDER NO.C6/10011/2010 DATED 31.03.2010 P2 :

TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.P1-601/2011 DATED 10.04.2012 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT P3 :

TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 05.02.2014 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE JJJ

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No. 28111 of 2015 (L) ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 23rd day of September, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner's grievance is that Ext.P3 representation dated 05.02.2014 has not been considered till date by the 2nd respondent.

2.

Considering the confined prayer made, there shall be a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider the representation, if received in original, in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing, within three months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this judgment.

The Writ Petition is disposed of without any observation on merits, which shall be decided by the 2nd respondent, in accordance with law.

Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE jjj