High Court of KeralaWP(C)/28360/2014dismissed as infructuous

K.V.Khalid v. State Election Commission

2015-12-21Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH MONDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/30TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 28360 of 2014 (T) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- K.V.KHALID AGED 32 YEARS S/O. MUHAMMED, KEEZHATTUVEETTIL HOUSE, ARIKKATTU P.O. THALAKKADATHUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 676 103. BY ADVS.SRI.P.CHANDRASEKHAR SRI.P.A.MOHAMMED SHAH SRI.SOORAJ T.ELENJICKAL SMT.P.M.MAZNA MANSOOR RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. STATE ELECTION COMMISSIONER, OFFICE OF THE KERALA STATE ELECTION COMMISSIONER THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.695 004

2. THANALUR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY THANALUR GRAMA PANCHAYATH THANALUR P.O. MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

3. SECRETARY THANALUR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, THANALUR MALAPPURAM- 676 307.

4. N.MUJEEB, MEMBER WARD NO.9, THANALUR GRAMA PANCHAYATH THANALUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT PIN-676 307 R4 BY ADV. SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN R2-R3 BY ADV. SRI.C.M.MOHAMMED IQUABAL R1 BY SRI.MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, SC,K.S.E.COMM THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 2112-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 28360 of 2014 (T) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT-P1-TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT IN O.P. NO. 90/2013 DATED 30/08/2014.

EXHIBIT-P2-TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT DATED 05/09/2014.

EXHIBIT-P3-TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 12/09/2014 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT-P4-TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN W.P(C) 23401/2014 DATED 24/10/2014. EXHIBIT-P5-TRUE COPY OF THE DECISION NO. 6 OF THE COUNCIL FOR 2ND RESPONDENT PANCHAYATH DATED 20/09/2014.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS ---------------------------------------

V.CHITAMBARESH, J.

--------------------- W.P (C) No.28360 of 2014 --------------------- Dated this the 21st day of December, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The disqualification proposed is co-terminous with the term. The term has expired and the writ petition has become infructuous. Hence the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. V.CHITAMBARESH, Judge.

sks