P.Abdul Kareem v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/15TH ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 28235 of 2015 (D) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
P.ABDUL KAREEM, AGED 66 YEARS, S/O.PEER MUHAMMED, VAZHATHOPPIL VEEDU, EDAPALAYAM P.O KOLLAM.
BY ADVS.SRI.PRAVEEN K. JOY SRI.T.A.JOY RESPONDENT(S):
1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM - 695 001.
2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOLLAM - 691 001.
3. CHIEF ENGINEER (IRRIGATION & ADMINISTRATION), IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, TRIVANDRUM - 695 001.
4. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM 691506.
5. THE SECRETARY, ARYANKAVU GRAMA PANCHAYATH, ARYANKAVU, KOLLAM - 691 309.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.ABDUL SALAM.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rvs.
WP(C).No. 28235 of 2015 (D) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS :
EXT. P1 - THE TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DATED 5.11.2014 OF ARYANKAVU VILLAGE.
EXT. P2 - THE TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 22.8.14 IN WPC.29668/13 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT.
EXT. P3 - THE TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 22.11.2014 OF THE PETITIONER.
EXT. P4 - THE TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE DIRECTION ISSUED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR DATED 22.11.2014.
EXT. P5 - THE TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE LETTER DATED 6.1.2015 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER.
EXT. P6 - THE TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE REPRESENTATION BEFORE THE RESPONDENTS. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:
NIL.
/TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE RVS.
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
---------------------------------------- W.P(C)No. 28235 of 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 7th day of October, 2015
J U D G M E N T
Petitioner approached respondents 2 to 4 by Ext.P6 request. The request in Ext.P6 is to complete the check-dam project with 580 meter protection wall with 4 meter width and also to make motorable way for the entire 580 meter before the installation of shutter for Check-dam.
2. This Court is of the view that the fourth respondent/the Superintending Engineer shall consider Ext.P6. Appropriate decision shall be taken by the second respondent, after hearing the petitioner as well as the fourth respondent within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. This writ petition is disposed of as above.
sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, Judge MBS/