← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/28255/2015dismissed as infructuous

R.Vijayalekshmi v. The Managing Director, Sidco

2015-11-02Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN MONDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/11TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 28255 of 2015 (F) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

-------------------- R.VIJAYALEKSHMI AGED 45 YEARS W/O.GANESH KUMAR S., RESIDING AT T.C.38/2890 PAZHAYASALA ROAD, KILLIPALAM THIRUVANANTHAPURAMPIN-695 036.

BY ADV. SRI.A.CHANDRA BABU RESPONDENTS:

------------------------

1. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, SIDCO P.B.NO.50, HOUSING BOARD BUILDING, SANTHI NAGAR THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 001.

2. THE DGM (PRODUCTION) SIDCO, P.B.NO.50, HOUSING BOARD BUILDING SANTHI NAGAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 001.

3. THE CHIEF SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ERNAKULAM. R1-R2 BY ADV. SMT.K.K.RAZIYA, SC, SMALL INDUSTRIES DEVP. CORPN., SIDCO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. A. LOWSY R BY SRI.R.T.PRADEEP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 28255 of 2015 (F) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1 - TRUE COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION INVITING APPLICATION FOR THE POST OF UNSKILLED WORK IN KERALA SMALL INDUSTRIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION DATED 10.10.2013 P2 - TRUE COPY OF THE ADMIT CARD FOR GROUP DISCUSSION ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER.

P3 - TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 01.02.2014 P4 - TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 07.08.2014 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

P5 - TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDERS DATED 26.08.2015 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS --------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE JJJ

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No. 28255 of 2015 (F) ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 2nd day of November, 2015

J U D G M E N T

None appears for the petitioner.

2.

The petitioner is said to have been reinstated in service.

The learned Standing Counsel for the respondent submits that the matter has become infructuous.

Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE jjj 2/11/15