Annakutty Mathew v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE FRIDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/27TH BHADRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 28324 of 2015 (M) PETITIONER(S):
---------------------- ANNAKUTTY MATHEW, W/O.(THE LATE) MATHEW, AGED 70 YEARS, KANDATHUMKARA HOUSE, NEDUMKANDAM P.O., IDUKKI DISTRICT, NOW RESIDING AT KANDATHUMKARA HOUSE, AZAD ROAD, KALOOR P.O., KOCHI-17. BY ADV. SMT.K.NANDINI RESPONDENT(S):
------------------------- 1.
STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695001.
2.
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, IDUKKI, PAINAVU P.O., PIN-685603. 3.
TALUK OFFICER, UDUMBANCHOLA, IDUKKI DISTRICT-685554. 4.
THE ADDITIONAL TAHSILDAR, UDUMBANCHOLA, IDUKKI DISTRICT-685554. 5.
GEOLOGIST, DEPARTMENT OF MINING & GEOLOGY, DISTRICT OFFICE, IDUKKI, MINI CIVIL STATION, THODUPUZHA-685584.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BIJU MEENATTOOR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
PJ
WP(C).No. 28324 of 2015 (M) APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS:
EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD.23.8.2012 TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXT.P1(a): TRUE COPY OF ACKNOWLEDGEMENT RECEIPT OF EXT.P1. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION FROM THE PETITIONER TO THE RESPONDENTS 2,1 & 4.
EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DTD.2.6.2014 FROM THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 4TH RESPONDENT.
EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION UNDER THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT FROM PETITIONER'S SON TO THE INFORMATION OFFICER AT 2ND RESPONDENT DTD.28.5.2013.
EXT.P5: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION UNDER THE R.T.I. ACT FROM PETITIONER'S HUSBAND TO THE INFORMATION OFFICER ATTACHED TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
EXT.P6: TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DTD.6.12.2011 FROM PETITIONER'S HUSBAND TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS:
NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE PJ
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
W.P(C)No. 28324 of 2015 Dated this the 18th day of September, 2015
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner, pointing out the anomalies in survey, has approached the District Collector. The District Collector forwarded the same to the fourth respondent by Ext.P3. Petitioner wants the finalisation of Ext.P3.
2. In view of the above, there shall be a direction to the fourth respondent to finalise the proceedings referred to in Ext.P3, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after notice to the petitioner. This writ petition is disposed of with the above direction. sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, Judge MBS/