High Court of KeralaWP(C)/28361/2015disposed of

K.Vijayakumar v. The Manager, Canara Bank

2015-10-16Honourable Dr. Justice A.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR FRIDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/24TH ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 28361 of 2015 (U) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :

--------------------- K.VIJAYAKUMAR, AGED 52 YEARS S/O.MADHAVAN, KUNNIYATH HOUSE, VELIKKADU P.O. MUNDUR, PALAKKAD - 678 592.

BY ADV. SRI.T.K.SANDEEP RESPONDENT(S) :

----------------------------

1. THE MANAGER, CANARA BANK, KONGAD BRANCH, PALAKKAD, PIN - 678 631.

2. AUTHORISED OFFICER, CANARA BANK, KONGAD BRANCH, PALAKKAD PIN - 678 631.

BY ADV. SRI.P.M.MURICKEN, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Mn ...2/-

WP(C).No. 28361 of 2015 (U) ---------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS :

------------------------------------- EXT.P-1:

A TRUE COPY OF THE 13(4) NOTICE DATED 21.7.2015 ISSUED BY IST RESPONDENT CANARA BANK.

EXT.P-2:

A TRUE COPY OF THE E-SALE NOTICE ISSUED BY CANARA BANK FOR SALE ON 22.9.2015.

EXT.P-3:

A TRUE COPY OF THE CORONARY ANGLOGRAM REPORT DATED 3.6.2015 FROM DISTRICT HOSPITAL, PALAKKAD.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL -------------------------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Mn

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.

............................................................. W.P.(C).No.28361 of 2015 ............................................................. Dated this the 16th day of October, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner approached this Court aggrieved by the steps taken by the respondent bank for recovery of the defaulted loan amounts. When the matter came up for admission on 18.09.2015, this Court had granted the petitioner an interim stay of further proceedings pursuant to Ext.P2 notice on condition that the petitioner paid an amount of Rs.1,50,000/- to the respondents on or before 15.10.2015. When the matter was called today, it is submitted that the petitioner has not complied with the directions issued by this Court. Under the said circumstances, I am of the view that, the petitioner is not entitled to any discretionary relief from this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, in the present writ petition.

Resultantly, the writ petition fails and is accordingly dismissed.

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE mns/16.10.15