← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/28396/2015disposed of

Zacariah v. State Of Kerala

2015-09-18Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE FRIDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/27TH BHADRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 28396 of 2015 (Y) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------- ZACARIAH, S/O.ABOOBACKER HAJI, MANAKANAKATH HOUSE, PUNNATHALA DESOM, TIRUR TALUK.

BY ADVS.SMT.K.P.SANTHI SRI.R.JAYAKRISHNAN (MUTHUKULAM) SRI.RILGIN V.GEORGE SMT.E.U.DHANYA RESPONDENT(S):

--------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONALOFFICER, MOOVATTUPUZHA - 686 601.

BY SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.K.SOYUZ THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

mbr/

WP(C).No. 28396 of 2015 (Y) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS:

EXT. P1 :

TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 3.7.2015 SUBMITTED TO 2ND RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:

NIL.

//TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE mbr/

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.28396 of 2015 ---------------------------------- Dated this the 18th day of September, 2015.

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner has approached the second respondent under Clause 6 of Kerala Land Utilisation Order.

2. The petitioner's case is that the above land is a converted land much before the enactment of Act 28/2008.

3. In view of the claim of the petitioner, the case shall be considered under Clause 6 of the Keala Land Utilisation Order by the second respondent, after verifying the draft Data Bank to find out whether the property of the petitioner is a paddy or wet land under Act 28/2008. If the property is not classified as above, necessarily the application of the petitioner shall be considered under Clause 6 of KLU Order for utilising other purpose. Needful shall be done within a period of two months of receipt of copy of this judgment, after giving notice to the petitioner. sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, MBS/ Judge.