High Court of KeralaWP(C)/28402/2015disposed of

Janaki v. State Of Kerala

2015-10-05Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE MONDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/13TH ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 28402 of 2015 (A) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :

----------------------- JANAKI, AGED 74 YEARS, DAUGHTER OF MAMBRAKATTIL LAKSHMIKUTTY AMMA, CHENATHNADU DESOM, KIZHAKKECHALAKUDY VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM.

BY ADVS.SMT.K.P.SANTHI SRI.R.JAYAKRISHNAN (MUTHUKULAM) SMT.V.SHARMILA SMT.E.U.DHANYA RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, TRIVANDRUM -695 001

2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CIVIL STATION, THRISSUR -680 003

3. THE TAHSILDAR, CHALAKKUDY, THRISSUR -680 307 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BIJU MEENATTOOR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

sts

WP(C).No. 28402 of 2015 (A) ------------------------------------------ APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1:

TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 31.12.2012 OF THE PETITIONER P2:

TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DATED E 21532/2013 DATED 26.07.2013 OF THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR (GENERAL) P3:

TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATIONS DATED 27.07.2013 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER P4:

TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATIONS DATED 10.04.2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER P5:

TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 04.04.2015 SUBMITTED TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

NIL ----------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE sts

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

***************************************************************************** W.P.(C) No.28402 of 2015 ****************************************************************************** Dated this the 5th day of October, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner approached the second respondent for cancelling transfer of registry. Exts.P3 and P4 are the representations made by the petitioner before the second respondent.

This Court is of the view, necessary decision shall be taken on Exts.P3 and P4 after hearing the petitioner and the person in whose favour transfer of registry is effected. It is also open for the second respondent to remit Exts.P3 and P4 by the consideration of the Revenue Divisional Officer of the Thrissur District. Needful shall be done within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE ln