N.Vidyadharan v. The Director General Of Police
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA THURSDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/16TH ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 28451 of 2015 (F) ---------------------------- CRIME NO.1000/2013 OF VENJARAMOODU POLICE STATION. .......
PETITIONER(S):
-------------------------- N. VIDHYADARAN, S/O.NARAYANAN, MANNUVILAKATHU VEEDU, V.S. BHAVAN, ANACHAL, KALAMACHAL P.O., VAMANAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADV. SRI.M.R.SARIN.
RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------------
1. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, POLICE HEADQUARTERS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
2. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, PALAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
3. K.R. BIJU, SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ATTINGAL POLICE STATION, (FORMERLY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VENJARAMOOD), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
R1 & R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.P. MAYA.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
rs.
WP(C).No. 28451 of 2015 (F) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- EXT.P1.
TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN OP NO.49/2014 BEFORE THE STATE POLICE COMPLAINTS AUTHORITY.
EXT.P2.
TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT ON 21/07/2015.
RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- NIL.
//TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE rs.
B. KEMAL PASHA, J.
````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No.28451 of 2015 F ````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 8th day of October, 2015
J U D G M E N T
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ What is complained of is that in spite of the specific observations and findings by the State Police Complaints Authority, Thiruvananthapuram against the 3rd respondent, no disciplinary action has been initiated by the department. 2.
The learned Public Prosecutor submits that a departmental enquiry has already been ordered in the matter and memo of charges has been prepared and got approved, and the same will be issued to the 3rd respondent. By recording the said submission, this writ petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to again approach this Court or appropriate forum at appropriate stage.
Sd/- (B.KEMAL PASHA, JUDGE) aks/08/10 // True Copy // PA to Judge