← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/28483/2015disposed of

K.Arunkumar v. Superintending Engineer

2015-09-183 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE FRIDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/27TH BHADRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 28483 of 2015 (I) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

----------------------- K.ARUNKUMAR, S/O.PADMANABHAN NAMBIAR, RESIDING AT MOHALAYAM, MAKKADA P.O., KOZHIKODE - 673 611.

BY ADVS.SRI.V.V.SURENDRAN SRI.P.A.HARISH RESPONDENT(S):

-------------------------- 1.

THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, KERALA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, BUILDINGS, NORTH CIRCLE, PWD COMPLEX, KOZHIKODE - 673 001.

2.

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KERAL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, BUILDINGS, NORTH CIRCLE, PWD COMPLEX, KOZHIKODE - 673 001.

BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.C.K.SHERIN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: msv/

WP(C).No. 28483 of 2015 (I) -------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:

-------------------------------------- EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DTD.31.8.2015.

EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER OF 2ND RESPONDENT DTD.16.9.2015. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 4890/2015. EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF INTERIM ORDER IN WP(C) 32896/2014. EXT.P5: TRUE COPY OF INTERIM ORDER IN WP(C) 12407/2015. EXT.P6: TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 17137/2015. EXT.P7: TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DTD.10.9.2015. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

----------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S.TO JUDGE Msv/

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

================== W.P.(C).No. 28483 of 2015 ================== Dated this the 18th day of September, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner has been awarded the work as per Ext.P1. As per the Ext.P1, the petitioner is directed to furnish security deposit of worth Rs.10,67,200/-, out of which 50% amount should be as Treasury Deposit. The petitioner has executed certain other works and is entitled for around two crores as per Ext.P2. In view of the above, the amount payable by the petitioner towards the security deposit shall be adjusted from the amount due to him as per Ext.P2.

The writ petition is disposed of, as above.

sd/- sab A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE