← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/28518/2015disposed of

Muhammed Haji.P.V v. The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority

2015-09-22Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH TUESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/31ST BHADRA, 1937H WP(C).No. 28518 of 2015 (L) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------ MUHAMMED HAJI.P.V., S/O. VEERAN KOYA, 13/218, SAEEDA MANZIL, KIZHEDATH HOUSE, KUTTIKATTOOR P.O., KOZHIKODE 673 008.

BY ADVS.SRI.G.HARIHARAN SRI.PRAVEEN.H.

RESPONDENT:

--------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOZHIKODE 673 001.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. K.A. SANJEETHA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C) NO. 28518/2015 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 :

TRUE COPY OF THE PERMIT ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT IN THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER RELATING TO BUS NO. KL-11AJ-6358. EXHIBIT P2 :

TRUE COPY OF THE TIMINGS OF THE PETITIONER'S SERVICE VIZ. BUS NO. KL-11AJ-6358.

EXHIBIT P3 :

TRUE COPY OF THE TIME SHEET RELATING TO BUS NO KL-11R9495. EXHIBIT P4 :

TRUE COPY OF THE TIME SHEET RELATING TO BUS NO. KO-11Q3227. EXHIBIT P5 :

TRUE COPY OF THE TIME SHEET RELATING TO BUS NO. KL-45C3029. EXHIBIT P6 :

TRUE COPY OF REQUEST DATED 16.06.2014 MADE BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENT(S) EXHIBITS : NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE.

V. CHITAMBARESH, J -------------------------------- WP(C) NO. 28518 OF 2015 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 22nd day of September, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner confines his relief to an early consideration of Ext.P6 representation filed to revise the timings of the operation of his stage carriage service on the route covered by the permit.

2.

I direct the respondent to consider Ext.P6 representation and decide about the necessity to revise the timings as sought within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

3.

Needless to say that the petitioner as well as the other operators on the route shall be put on notice and heard in the exercise.

The Writ Petition is disposed of.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE ncd