D.Dileep Kumar v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH TUESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/31ST BHADRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 28534 of 2015 (N) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
----------------- 1.
D.DILEEP KUMAR, S/O.DAMODARAN, VATTAMALAYIL HOUSE, KADALIKKADU P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
2.
RATHEESH, S/O.PEETHABARAN, INJIKKALAYIL HOUSE, VAZHAKKULAM P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
3.
PRADEESH, S/O.KUNJAPPAN MEEMBANIKKAD HOUSE, VAZHAKKULAM P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
4.
KUMARAN, S/O.KRISHNAN KUZHUMBIL HOUSE MUVATTUPUZHA P.O., PERINGAZHA ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
5.
GEORGE, S/O.YOHANNAN CHENNIYAPPILLIL HOUSE KADAVOOR P.O., PAINGOTHUR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
6.
MANILAL, S/O.WILSON VADAKKUMKARAYIL HOUSE PANDAPPILLI P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT BY ADVS.SRI.P.P.THAJUDEEN SMT.P.B.WAHIDA SMT.C.SEENA
W.P.(C) No.28534/2015 : 2 :
RESPONDENT(S):
------------------- 1.
STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY MOTOR TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT SECRETARIATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.
2.
THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE THODUPUZHA POLICE STATION THODUPUZHA P.O., IDUKKI DISTRICT PIN - 685 584.
3.
THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER OFFICE OF THE JOINT RTO THODUPUZHA P.O., IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN - 685 584.
R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.SANJEETHA.K.A.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
APPENDIX IN W.P.(C) No.28534 OF 2015 PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 :
TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FURNISHED BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT DATED 5.8.2015 EXHIBIT P2 :
TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT DATED 3.9.2015 EXHIBIT P3 :
TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BEFORE THE THIRD RESPONDENT DATED 14.9.2015.
RESPONDENT(S) EXHIBITS NIL.
//TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE.
V.CHITAMBARESH, J.
--------------------- W.P (C) No.28534 of 2015 --------------------- Dated this the 22nd day of September, 2015
J U D G M E N T
The petitioners lament that contract carriage operators indulge in running a parallel service. This adversely affects the stage carriage operations continued by the petitioners. The petitioners have in this regard submitted Ext.P3 representation to the third respondent.
2. I direct the third respondent to consider Ext.P3 representation with notice to the petitioners and the affected contract carriage operators. The same shall be done within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Any decision so taken by the third respondent shall be implemented by the second respondent.
The Writ Petition is disposed of.
Sd/- V.CHITAMBARESH, Judge.
nj/220915