Rajendra Prasad v. The Sub Inspector Of Police, Kallambalam Police Station
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON THURSDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/7TH PHALGUNA, 1936 WP(C).No. 31212 of 2013 (B) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
---------------------- RAJENDRA PRASAD, S/O.NARAYANAN, AGED 52 YEARS, RESIDING AT OTTATHIL PADIJATTATHIL, ERAVIPURAM, ERAVIPURAM VILLAGE, KOLLAM TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT. (OWNER OF TIPPER LORRY BEARING REGISTRATION NO.KL-16-D-5915) BY ADV. SRI.B.DIPU SACH DEEV RESPONDENT(S):
------------------------- THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KALLAMBALAM POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM RURAL, ATTINGAL SUB DIVISION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 691 512.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.M.MUHAMMED SHAFFI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: msv/
WP(C).No. 31212 of 2013 (B) ---------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P-1: TRUE COPY OF THE SEIZURE MAHAZAR DATED 3.12.2013 PREPARED BY THE RESPONDENT.
EXT.P-2: TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT DATED 23.7.2013 IN WPC NO.18247 OF 2013.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:
----------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S.TO JUDGE Msv/
P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON J.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C) No. 31212 of 2013 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated, this the 26th day of February, 2015
JUDGMENT
The vehicle bearing No. KL 16 D 5915 was seized by the respondent/S.I. of Police alleging offence under the Mines and Mineral (Development and Regulation) Act and the Kerala Minor Mineral Concession Rules. The main ground of challenge is that, the respondent is not having the jurisdiction or authority to effect seizure.
2. Heard both the sides.
3. The authority of the respondent to effect seizure has already been considered by this Court and the power and competence has been upheld as per the decision reported in Aloshias C. Antony Vs. Government of Kerala [2014(1) KLT 536]. The said decision was rendered, also taking note of the nature of offence which is a 'cognizable' one (notwithstanding anything contained in the Cr.P.C) as stipulated in Section 21(6) of MMDR Act, 1957 and also placing reliance on the judgment rendered by a Division Bench of this Court in Construction Materials Movers Association V. State of Kerala [2008 (4) KLT 909]. In the said circumstance, there is no tenable ground to call for interference.
W.P.(C) No. 31212 of 2013 : 2 :
4. When the matter came up for consideration on 17.12.2013, the vehicle was caused to be released, on satisfaction of a sum Rs.25,000/- and on execution of a simple bond. In the said circumstance, the further course of action required is to surrender the vehicle before the respondent, so as to enable the respondent to produce it before the concerned Magistrate having jurisdiction over the area and to proceed with steps for prosecution, unless the offence is sought to be compounded.
5. The petitioner expresses desire to compound the offence by virtue of the enabling provisions under the relevant provisions of law. This Court finds it fit and proper to permit the petitioner to have the offence compounded on satisfying the compounding fee of Rs.25,000/-. The amount ordered to be paid as per the interim order dated 17.12.2013 shall be treated as compounding fee and offence shall be treated as compounded. Once the offence is compounded, no prosecution proceedings will lie in view of the law declared by this Court in Digil Vs. Sub Inspector of Police [2013
(1) KLT 600]. It shall be reported to the concerned Magistrate, if the crime has already been reported. If there is any failure in satisfying the compounding fee, the respondent shall pursue further
W.P.(C) No. 31212 of 2013 : 3 :
steps in connection with the prosecution before the concerned Magistrate having jurisdiction over the area. The writ petition is disposed of.
Sd/- P. R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, (JUDGE) kmd