Sheeba v. The Superintendent Of Police(Rural)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE TUESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/31ST BHADRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 28577 of 2015 (V) ------------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S) :

------------------------- SHEEBA, AGED 35 YEARS, D/O.KUMARI, ODALVALLIKONATHU VEEDU, PARAYAMVILAKATHU, THEKKADA, VEMBAYAM, TRIVANDRUM.

BY ADVS.SRI.ANIL KUMAR M.SIVARAMAN SRI.B.M.SHAH RESPONDENT(S) :

----------------------------

1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE(RURAL), TRIVANDRUM.

2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NEDUMANGAD POLICE STATION, TRIVANDRUM DISTRICT.

3. SANTHOSH, KUNNINPURATHU VEEDU, KURAKKODE, NEDUMANGAD, TRIVANDRUM DISTRICT.

R1 & R2 BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.I.DAVIS THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Msd.

WP(C).No. 28577 of 2015 (V) ------------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS :

----------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN O.P.NO.121/2015 DATED 10.04.2015 PASSED BY THE FAMILY COURT, NEDUMANGAD. EXHIBIT P2: TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION SUBMITTED BEFORE THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NEDUMANGAD DATED 04.03.2015. EXHIBIT P2(A): TRUE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF EXHIBIT-P2 PETITION. EXHIBIT P3: TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE PETITION DATED 17.07.2015 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE RURAL S.P.

EXHIBIT P3(A): TRUE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF EXHIBIT-P3 PETITION. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :

------------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A.TO JUDGE.

Msd.

ASHOK BHUSHAN, C.J.

& A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J.

================ W.P. (C) No. 28577 of 2015 ================== Dated this, the 22nd day of September, 2015

J U D G M E N T

Shaffique, J.

Petitioner has approached this Court seeking police protection and complaining about the cruelties that are being inflicted on her by the 3rd respondent, who was her former husband. It is stated that the 3rd respondent being involved in several criminal cases is not permitting her to carry on the work of Waitress in a canteen by coming to the canteen and abusing her. It is also alleged that her daughter was also being abused by the 3rd respondent. Though Exts.P2 and P3 complaints were filed before the police, no action has been taken in the matter and therefore, the petitioner has approached this Court. 2.

Having regard to the nature of judgment we propose to pass, no notice is being issued to the 3rd respondent. 3.

Since the petitioner has already given Exts.P2 and P3

W.P(C) No.28577/15 -:2:- complaints, the 2nd respondent shall consider the said complaints and take appropriate action in accordance with law. Writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/- ASHOK BHUSHAN, CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- A.M. SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE Rp 22/9/2015 //True Copy// PS to Judge