High Court of KeralaWP(C)/28641/2015disposed of

Neethu Rajeev v. The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority

2015-09-23Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/1ST ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 28641 of 2015 (E) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------- NEETHU RAJEEV, 2/2438-B, NAIRKULANGARA THAZHENILAM, PARAMMEL ROAD, MALAPARAMBA, KOZHIKODE.

BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN RESPONDENT:

--------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY CUM REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, KOZHIKODE 673 020.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. K.A. SANJEETHA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C) NO. 28641/2015 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 :

TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT DATED 27.06.2015 ON THE ROUTE KAVUNTHARA-ULLIYERI-KOZHIKODE WITH STAGE CARRIAGE KL 11/U 8399.

EXHIBIT P2 :

TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 10.09.2015 IN WPC NO. 27294/2015 RESPONDENT(S) EXHIBITS : NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE.

V. CHITAMBARESH, J -------------------------------- WP(C) NO. 28641 OF 2015 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 23rd day of September, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner confines his relief to an early consideration of Ext.P1 representation filed to revise the timings of the operation of his stage carriage service on the route covered by the permit.

I direct the respondent to consider Ext.P1 representation and decide about the necessity to revise the timings as sought within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

Needless to say that the petitioner as well as the other operators on the route shall be put on notice and heard in the exercise.

The Writ Petition is disposed of.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE ncd