High Court of KeralaWP(C)/28642/2015closed

P.S. Ninan v. State Of Kerala

2015-11-20Honourable Mr. Justice Dama Seshadri Naidu5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU FRIDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/29TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 28642 of 2015 (E) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

--------------- P.S. NINAN, MEMBER, MANAGING COMMITTEE, AMBOORI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.T-274 AMBOORI P.O., NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE POONTHOTTAM RESPONDENTS:

-------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

2. JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL) THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

3. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES(GENERAL) NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.

4. AMBOORI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK, AMBOORI P.O., NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R4 BY ADV. SRI.G.SUDHEER R BY SRI. G. GOPAKUMAR, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.

---------------------------------- W.P. (C) No. 28642 of 2015 (E) ---------------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of November, 2015.

JUDGMENT

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader, apart from perusing the record.

2. The petitioner, a member of the 4th respondent's managing committee, filed this writ petition questioning what are said to be the steps being taken by the authorities to appoint an Administrator. This Court on 23.09.2015 issued an interim stay against the removal of the managing committee of the 4th respondent Bank.

3. As a matter of subsequent developments, election to the post of President of the Managing Committee took place and one among the members of the managing committee was also elected as the President.

4. In this context, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the stalemate which was apprehended to have been prevailing when a no confidence motion was moved against the then President now stands removed. According to him, in view of the

W.P.(C). No. 28642/2015 -2subsequent developments, the writ petition does not survive for further consideration.

5. The learned Government Pleader has agreed with the learned counsel for the petitioner.

In the facts and circumstances, this Court closes the writ petition as having not survived for further consideration. sd/- DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, JUDGE.

W.P.(C). No. 28642/2015 -3-