Ravidas v. The Director Genera;L Of Police
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA TUESDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/24TH BHADRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 28876 of 2014 (H) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :
------------ RAVIDAS, AGED 42 YEARS, S/O. KUNJU, VADAKKEPPURA HOUSE, VAROD, KOTTAYI, PALAKKAD.
BY ADVS.SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU (SR.) SMT.M.M.DEEPA SRI.UNNI SEBASTIAN KAPPEN RESPONDENTS:
------------
1. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CBCID, PALAKKAD - 678 001.
3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KOTTAYI POLICE STATION, PALAKKAD DISTRICT - 678 572.
4. GEETHA , AGED 30 YEARS, W/O. VINOD (LATE), GOKULAM HOUSE, VAROD, KOTTAYI VILLAGE, PALAKKAD DISTRICT - 678 572. R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.SAREENA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 28876 of 2014 (H) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS :
----------------------- P1 - COPY OF THE FIRST INFORMATION STATEMENT IN CRIME NO. 667/14 OF KOTTAYI POLICE STATION, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. P2 - COPY OF THE INQUEST REPORT ALONG WITH THE STATEMENTS OF WITNESSES RECORDED AT THE TIME OF INQUEST BY THE POLICE PERTAINING TO THE CRIME.
P3 - COPY OF THE F.I.R IN CRIME NO. 667/14 OF KOTTAYI POLICE STATION, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
P4 - COPY OF THE REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE KOTTAYI POLICE BEFORE THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS - I, PALAKKAD IN CRIME NO. 667/14.
P5 - COPY OF THE SUICIDE NOTE RECOVERED BY THE POLICE IN THE CRIME.
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS :
----------------------- NIL // True Copy // P.A. To Judge DSV/15/9/15
B.KEMAL PASHA, J.
=================== W.P.(C).No.28876 of 2014 ==================== Dated this the 15th day of September, 2015
J U D G M E N T
The accused in Crime No.667 of 2014 of the Kottayi Police Station has come up by seeking investigation of the matter by an officer not below the rank of a DySP.
2. Heard the learned Senior Counsel and the learned Government Pleader.
3. On hearing either side and on going through the matter, it seems that presently, the matter is too premature to say whether the offences alleged against the petitioner will lie or not. Presently, this Court is unable to note down any lapse
W.P.(C).No.28876 of 2014 committed by the investigating officer in conducting the investigation. The investigation seems to be in proper line. Presently there is nothing to interfere with the matter. Let the matter be investigated.
With liberty to the petitioner to approach this Court or appropriate court at any further stage on specific grievances, this Writ Petition (Civil) is closed.
Sd/- B. KEMAL PASHA JUDGE DSV/15/9/15 // True Copy // P.A. To Judge